It’s guaranteed to get some notice. Stir up some controversy. Garner publicity. And sell comic books. Which is, at the end of the day, what it’s all about, right? Sure. But there’s a good way and a bad way to go about it. So which approach is Marvel taking right now? I’d say, for the most part, the right way. Sure, making Captain America a black man and Thor a woman is a stunt. Or stunts, plural. And having them kiss is an even bigger stunt. Throw in the fact that it’s going to be an INTERRACIAL kiss, and it’s all so much better! Feathers will get ruffled and second printings, and thirds and maybe fourths, will take place. Cha-ching!

Still, I think it’s okay. Remember Marvel back in the 90s? If so, my sympathies. The focus then, as now, was on making the mean green, and they used stunts and gimmicks galore to do it. Or tried to. The approach failed and ultimately led the company to bankruptcy, because the gimmicks and stunts were not supported by good storytelling. Marvel, in its haste to make money, had forgotten that the quality of the product actually played a part in it. The big M has since learned that lesson, and for dang sure Disney knows it. Thus while we still get stunts and gimmicks—like this kiss—they are backed up by solid story content and strong characterization. I’m cool with that.

source: wixtechs.com

Sorry, Frank Miller. Or Brian Azzarello. The linked-to article doesn’t specify which of the two co-writers of DARK KNIGHT 3: THE MASTER RACE actually said that this new comic, and specifically its introduction of a FEMALE in the role of “Batman,” is going to “piss people off.” I kinda doubt that it does. It just isn’t that big a deal nowadays. I know this will disappoint Frank, who delights in rubbing fans the wrong way.

Miller’s THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS became an instant classic when it was released back in the 80s. It introduced an old, retired Bruce Wayne (who quickly enough came out of retirement) and a female Robin. That girl sidekick has now risen up to take over the role of Gotham City’s Caped Crusader. This would be more newsworthy if DC hadn’t already done it with the character Batwoman a few years back. And after the sequel to THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS, which debuted several years back, failed to leap over the critical and creative bar set so high by its predecessor, this latest effort has even more to live up to. Can Frank pull off the hat trick?

source: nypost.com

So let’s see if we can get this straight. The reason Captain America Steve Rogers and stand-in Captain America Sam Wilson are no longer on speaking terms is because one’s a Democrat and one’s a Republican? And we’re given the rather trite challenge of trying to guess which one is which? Um, no. That would be too simplistic and, given that Marvel doesn’t want to risk alienating any longtime fans (or new ones, recruited by their cinematic universe), pretty dumb. No, Captain America must represent ALL Americans. He can’t take political sides. He must remain neutral. At least that’s how Steve Rogers views it, and so do I.

Sam, though, wants to take a more active role in political matters. That’s the crux of their argument. It’s an intriguing story idea, having Sam as Cap speaking out more openly on certain issues than Steve did. Marvel can be a little controversial—remember, the Captain America comic has in the past offended some Rightwing group, and reaped some free publicity from it—without tarnishing the iconic character as he is depicted in the movies. How far are they willing to go? Just how vocal will Falcon-Cap be? We’ll just have to wait to find out.

source: io9.com

Times sure have changed, and they changed pretty fast. Just a few short years ago, the hinting that a comic character MIGHT be gay was enough to get a writer fired (Remember when Northstar was “outted” in Alpha Flight?) and have fans boycotting. Now you can’t turn a comic book page without hitting a gay character. This is a good thing. I believe comics SHOULD feature a wider diversity of characters; not all our heroes and villains need to be heterosexual white males. Comics should reflect real life in that regard. People come in all shapes, sizes, colors, religions and sexual orientations.

Do you sense a “but” coming?

BUT. If it feels forced. (If you are retconning an established character, for example.) Even when handled by a master scribe like Brian Bendis. If you are basically shoehorning a character into a new role—Let’s make this hero a female! Let’s make this hero gay! Oh, we need a Latino superhero now. Let’s create one!—just for the sake of having a gay/Latino/Muslim/vegan/whatever, it becomes a case of tokenism. That’s a bad word. “Token.” It cheapens the value of that diversity creators are trying to establish in comics.

Iceman has been around for 50 years. And we’re just NOW learning that he is gay?

source: www.advocate.com