Marvel’s biggest event just got bigger.

Marvel Comics’ mega-event SECRET WARS is now set to conclude at the end of the year with a bombastic NINTH issue. This is good news for fans, as the hordes of geekdom have been almost universal in their praise for this series. In case you’re one of the three comic readers who imprudently chose to pass on this one, here’s the skinny: All the universes in the multiverse slammed together, two at a time, until only the Ultimate universe and Marvel’s original 616 were left. When those two had their smash-up, it looked like the end of everything—until Dr. Doom managed to reforge all reality into one massive planet called BATTLEWORLD, fixing himself in place as its god and master. But some heroes from the original 616 and Ultimate universes have shown up, and the stage is set for the conquest of Battleworld. And now it will take an extra issue to tell the story.

Personally, I expect writer Jonathan Hickman to kill Reed Richards at the end of the tale. Don’t care; I can’t stand that character. I just hope he doesn’t also kill off Doom. I know such a thing would be temporary—likely until Marvel regains the movie rights to the characters—but the new Marvel that will come into being after Secret Wars needs Doom in it. It can get by just fine without Mr. Fantastic.

source: games.yahoo.com

Doom is a genius in physics, robotics, cybernetics, genetics, weapons technology, bio-chemistry, and time travel. He is also self-taught in the mystic arts. Doom is a natural leader, a brilliant strategist, and a sly deceiver.

Last week I pontificated on the abysmal failure of the latest FANTASTIC FOUR movie. Which reminded me of the two previous abysmal failures. All of which reminds me of the greatest transgression this slew of films has committed. No, not by casting Jessica Alba, who couldn’t ACT like she was in pain if you smashed her big toe with a hammer. No, not by making the Human Torch a black dude. No, not by depicting Galactus as a big puffy cloud with an attitude. The greatest disservice of which the FF movies are complicit is paid to Doctor Doom. And this is, I believe, the primary reason why they failed. You can’t cast Doom as a smarmy playboy or a whiny brat and expect it to fly. Screw the people in the blue suits, with the 4s on their chests. If Doom doesn’t work, the movie won’t work.

Doom is tied with the Joker, in my opinion, as the greatest villain in comics. That’s if he IS a villain. A good argument could be made that he is, in fact, a ruthless, megalomaniacal HERO. (After all, in the current SECRET WARS storyline, it was Doom, not the Avengers or any of the other Marvel heroes, who saved the Multiverse, sorta.) And how badass is the guy? He just KILLED THE FREAKIN’ DARK PHOENIX. You do NOT wanna mess with Dr. Doom. Which is why the makers of those asinine movies better be glad that Doom isn’t living in THIS universe.

source: marvel.com

What did Josh Trank do?That was the question people were asking all over social media on Thursday night after the director of Fantastic Four tweeted — and then quickly deleted — a message slamming his own movie on the eve of its debut.

Director Josh Trank wants us all to know it’s not his fault that FANTASTIC FOUR sucks like a Hoover jacked up on steroids. He posted, or “tweeted,” as much, before he quickly deleted said tweet, but a mere moment in cyber-time is equivalent to an eternity; people noticed, people copied and pasted, and the word quickly got around; no doubt news of Trank’s acknowledgement that his movie was garbage helped to squelch its already meager box office and it into one of the biggest bombs ever, insomuch as films inspired by comic books are concerned. I doubt Trank has committed career suicide by his honesty, though. If having his name attached to this picture in the first place doesn’t shoot down his rising star, passing the blame on to the studio isn’t likely to do it. After all, there are other studios.

By far the harshest critique I’ve read is that the previous two FF movies, directed by Tim Story, were actually BETTER than this new one. I don’t see how that’s possible. This new one might be just as bad, maybe. But worse? Can they GET any worse? The only way to find out for sure would be for me to watch the new flick. And I’m not that much of a glutton for punishment.

source: www.ew.com

In their latest spotlight on examples of comic creators making commentary on other creators within the pages of comics, CSBG looks at the classic case of the inker who talked some trash in the background of a Spidey comic.

I tend to enjoy a good “secret” message in my comics. Usually it’s a dig at a rival. I remember the 90s, that low water mark of the comic industry, when Peter David had the Incredible Hulk’s wife Betty put a fake fin on his head as a disguise. “It won’t work,” the Hulk told her. “Any idiot will take one look and say, ‘Oh, it’s the Hulk with a fin on his head!’” This was an obvious dig at Erik Larson’s character and comic, the Savage Dragon, which features essentially the Hulk with a fin on his head. The joke made me laugh then, and it still makes me laugh now, recalling it to memory.

Creators have to tread carefully, though, as these in-jokes can get them into trouble. Al Milgrom got canned (sort of) for sneaking in a dig at his former boss at Marvel comics, Bob Harras. (Interestingly enough, his fellow artist, the legendary John Romita, Sr. did NOT get in any trouble, so either Milgrom alone was responsible for the dig or else Romita is just so darn legendary he can get away with stuff like that.) Artist Simon Bisley has the bad habit of hiding not secret messages but drawings of uncircumcised penises in his work. (Admittedly it can be fun, trying to find them.) For me, as long as the story as a whole doesn’t suffer, I don’t mind the hidden messages (or penises) at all.

source: goodcomics.comicbookresources.com

A Japanese comic is one of the biggest topics on Chinese social media – despite a government ban.

The fact that a Communist regime restricts the freedoms of the individual is obvious to anyone with a functioning brain. And of all the Communist regimes still around—and there aren’t nearly as many as there used to be—the biggest by far is China. John Lennon told us all to imagine a world without religion to divide us, inspired partially by Chinese society (at least according to FORREST GUMP), but can you imagine living in a country where something as simple as reading a comic book can get you into trouble? I know I can’t. Or I don’t want to.

Among he things the Chinese government feels its citizenry doesn’t need access to is Manga, Japanese comics like DEATH NOTE. I’m not a Manga fan myself, but come on, China! Comic books? Really? It isn’t only under repressive regimes that such censorship occurs, though. There are more than a few morons right here in the good ol’ US of A who feel that comics are “kids’ stuff” and should be neutered of all hints of sex, violence, and adult concepts. They are just as dangerous in their own way as the Chinese Communists, and they are the reason why the CBLDF exists. And I’m sure DEATH NOTE scares them, too.

source: www.bbc.com

Greg Pak has written many comics for both Marvel and DC Comics, but he may be best known for his long run on the primary Hulk comic book franchise from 2006-2011.

There’s gonna be an all-new, all different Incredible Hulk! And Greg Pak is returning to script the series! And . . . I couldn’t care less. I have no interest in reading this new series and no interest in trying to discern the secret identity of this new jade giant. (My guess? Amadeus Cho.) I just don’t get why Marvel feels the need to replace all their primary players with stand-ins. Does that make them fresh and exciting? Not in my (comic) book.

Moreso than with Captain America, though (Steve Rogers is now an old man and The Falcon is playacting as Cap), or Thor (where Thor is a woman but the real Thor is still a prominent character in the book), the Hulk has had one too many redefining, status-quo-altering changes in too short an amount of time. First they split the Hulk and Banner into two separate people, then quickly ret-conned that. Then Banner got shot in the head, causing brain damage to him and his green alter-ego. THEN he was healed with Extremis technology, which left the Hulk with Banner’s intellect but lacking his conscience. Now they’re scrapping THAT storyline to give us a new Hulk. It has become tedious—and boring.

source: www.examiner.com

Quesada was joined by a half dozen other Marvel editors and writers to discuss upcoming book releases and plans, as well as answer questions from the audience. The most interesting point of the panel came with a discussion on diversity started by a fan thanking Marvel.

A Little Diversity Can Go A Long Way

They have to be careful. And I have to be careful.

Diversity in comics, as in all forms of entertainment, is a good thing, generally speaking, and I support Marvel’s (and DC’s, and the other comics publishers’) steps towards making their comic universes more representative of society as a whole, not just worlds filled with Caucasian male superheroes, where the only color comes from the costumes. But Marvel and the rest need to tread with caution, lest they wind up succumbing to that fatal flaw of good storytelling—tokenism—the creating of new black, Latino, gay, bisexual, transgender, Muslim, or even female primary characters just for the sake of having them, not because the storylines support it. This is a sort of reverse racism, and it doesn’t benefit anyone; it actually cheapens the effort while it weakens the overall product. They also need to be careful lest, as those new characters are still largely written by Caucasian men, their efforts ring false.

And I need to be careful, lest anyone misconstrue what I’m saying and label me as prejudiced or racist just for having the brass to suggest that this new “diversity” is not necessarily a good thing.

source: games.yahoo.com

The writer will wrap his run on the core series and the supporting New  Avengers title next year “around May”, he revealed on a Reddit AMA.

Where are they all going? Away, that’s where. There’s a mass exodus underway over the House of Ideas. At the forefront is writer Jonathon Hickman, the man who has pretty much directed the progression of the entire Marvel Universe for the past few years and one of the company’s vaunted “architects.” And he’s not alone in leaving. Another of the architects is going with him. Say bye-bye to Matt Fraction. Jason Aaron is staying (for now) as is Brian Michael Bendis. And Marvel has still got some proven talent, some big name creators, like Mark Waid. And Dan Slott’s still going to be writing Spider-Man, but fan favorite Kelly Sue Deconnick is pulling up stakes.

Is this bad news for Marvel fans? Should we be worried? Only time will tell, but the big M does have some talented up-and-coming writers to pick up where the heavy hitters are leaving off. Charles Soule is a proven talent, as is Gerry Duggan. Will the new “powers that be” prove capable of keeping their respective titles gliding at the heights of quality they currently enjoy? Or is it crash and burn time—and time to reconsider renewing some of those big contracts?

source: www.digitalspy.com

Aquaman #41 kicks off a new direction with the DCYOU campaign. Do Cullen Bunn and Trevor McCarthy deliver a great start or not? Find out here!

I never really understood why Aquaman got so much bad press. His character is no sillier than many if not most other superheroes. He’s basically the same character as Namor over in the Marvel Universe, and the Savage Sub-Mariner gets way more respect. Maybe it’s because Namor always straddles that line between hero and villain. Maybe Namor just exudes a more potent sense of gravitas, but that can be blamed on whoever is writing Aquaman at the time, can’t it? Maybe it’s because of SUPER FRIENDS, wherein Aquaman was never given much to do except summon fish. Who can say?

A concerted effort has been made to portray Aquaman in the comics as a badass. This trend seems to be continuing, as preview for issue 41 of the sea king’s current series promises a new direction and new storyline, combined with a new, edgier look. I admit, I kinda dig it, and I’m kinda excited about the new story arc. We can expect to see the character both visually and thematically start to resemble Jason Momoa more and more as we get nearer the release of the new Batman/Superman movie. And for him to quickly switch back to his “vintage” look, if the movie tanks.

source: www.comicbookrevolution.net

Although he’s famous as Marvel’s first and primary Spider-Man, there have been been questions about what Peter Parker’s role will be following the universe shattering events of Secret Wars . Well, wonder no longer.

I might as well come right out and admit it. I hate Miles Morales.

It’s not really his fault. It’s Marvel’s. If they had called him “Spider-Boy” or “Arachnakid” or whatever, I might have ended up loving him. But they went and named him Spider-MAN. And he is NOT, and will never BE, Spider-Man. Do I care that’s he’s biracial? Hell, no. (Although I do dislike the trend in comics right now, of creating new minority heroes just for the sake of having minority heroes. It feels like just what it is: tokenism. And that ends up DISrespecting minorities.) I care that he’s NOT Peter Parker, and Peter Parker IS Spider-Man. Simple as that.

It seems that Marvel, now that they’ve merged their 616 universe with the Ultimate Universe (Another confession: I never liked the Ultimate universe. It’s not the REAL Marvel.), intends to have TWO web-swinging superheroes of the same name. Okay, I won’t pitch too big a fit as long as they keep the REAL Spidey around. But I will never call Miles Morales Spider-Man. He will always be just Miles Morales to me. Or “The Imposter.”

(And if they’d just named him “The Imposter,” I’d have been okay with THAT, too.)

source: www.cinemablend.com