Tip of the hat to DC, for figuring out a way to give fans on both sides of the argument what they wanted, to let them have their cake and eat it too. Superman can be seen as a perfect depiction of the larger DC universe, and of the reactions of the readers to the comic line’s relaunch, the New 52, which some loved and some despised. (As time progressed, more and more hopped the fence and congregated on the “hate it” side.) Then DC killed off the New 52 Superman and replaced him with the pre-New 52 Superman, the married Superman (who now has a kid) with all the history. Some fans cheered the move and a smaller number howled in anguish.

By revealing that the New 52 Superman and the original post-Crisis Superman were not, after all, two different characters, but different facets of the same character, and by rejoining those two separated halves, DC made a move that should satisfy both camps. Superman also gets a new costume that looks a lot more like his old costume—minus the red briefs. (I’ve argued in the past that the entire New 52 movement was all about getting rid of the red underwear.) Welcome back, Superman! A fully restored Superman, at that. And extrapolating from the thought processes that led to the reunification of the character, which suggests that the same “fracturing” is true of ALL DC’s characters, might we see a “fully restored” Batman, Wonder Woman, etc. and etc. in the coming months?

I should begin this tirade by stating that I am myself a feminist, if we are going to go by the original, dictionary definition of the word. Originally, to say you are a proponent of feminism meant simply that you believe men and women are deserving of equal treatment, in the workplace and in society. I do believe that. Originally, then, feminism meant equality. Nothing more and nothing less. Like any ideology or school of thought, however, feminism has been hijacked by its extremists, to the extent that, when one hears the word today, sadly, what is called to mind is the extremist elements rather than the original philosophy. That’s a shame.

We have now reached a new low, a new depth of asinine stupidity, in the existence of PC culture, this low masquerading as “feminism.” I blame the Internet. The problem with the Internet, despite all the benefits that it has bequeathed us, is that any idiot can use it and every idiot does. Before the Internet, nobody would have paid the slightest attention to a loudmouthed PC loon. Now, with outlets like Twitter, those rare morons are able to find each other and start a “movement;” all that is needed is to add a hashtag. I also blame Warner Brothers, in that it would appear they have themselves drawn attention to the issue. In the new trailer for WONDER WOMAN, it appears that the lovely Ms. Gadot has either bleached her armpits or else the pits have been CGI’ed to make them look that way. (Which is itself stupid and unnatural.) Now there are moronic fem-extremists bitching that the character doesn’t have armpit hair. Since she grew up on an island filled with only men, according to these nitwits, she should have hairy pits. Because apparently personal grooming is an indication of a repressive patriarchal society, and hairy pits are signs of liberation and enlightenment. Yes, it is every bit as stupid as it sounds. But that’s PC culture for you. Any lamebrain can join in, and every lamebrain does! Halfwits who used to write on bathroom walls now get to display their imbecility online! #getafreakinlife #darwinawardwinnerswaitingtohappen